Long ago there was a group of committed Christians who set off on an endeavor that they were sure was the very will of God. This particular event was welcomed with shouts of “God wills it!” when it was announced by Pope Urban II in the fall of 1095. There may have never been such a popular outpouring for any announcement made by any Pope ever. A bit of hyperbole but it may just be true. It was the First Crusade which has become a black spot in our collective memory. And for many reasons it should be. With the coming of the First Crusade violence and devotion to God were combined to fuel a march to Jerusalem that ended on July 15, 1099 with the utter annihilation of thirty thousand Muslims and Jews living there. It was an act of savagery that shocked the civilized world at the time. (By civilized world I am not referring to Europe.) In modern discourse that Crusade will sometimes be mentioned as an example of Christians gone mad and many Christians would like to just forget it as a terrible aberration in the history of the church.
That, however, is a simplistic reading of history. The First Crusade was a product of its time. In that world might made right. If you had the military strength you had the right to take any land, city, country you could. Certainly the rise of Islam makes that clear but so does the history of Europe which includes the Pope leading armies. To understand the First Crusade in the light of its time is one way to understand what happened but that is not enough. The First Crusade did not just end and everyone went home. There was more to it. It is often forgotten that the First Crusade brought about a new kingdom in the middle east. The Kingdom of Jerusalem survived and thrived for many years building lasting institutions, that actually were good for European settlers and the people already living in the land.
What is not remembered about the First Crusade is that once it had taken Jerusalem it actually built a civilized and inclusive (for the time) kingdom that was not about annihilating the infidel but rather living with Jews, Muslims, and Orthodox Christians. The more liberal understanding came from a leadership that understood how much the new kingdom needed the cooperation of those around them. They were undermanned and it was difficult to get enough help from Europe. They had to cooperate in order to build a civilization. And they did. The Kingdom of Jerusalem learned tolerance and so prospered in a way that they could not have otherwise. Religious tolerance was a practical necessity.
The historical question is how did they do it? How did they go from fanatical ruthless killers to more reasonable and civilized governors of the land? The only answer I can offer is that these men and women had faced incredible suffering and degradation in those three years and this challenge and trouble matured them and helped them want and seek the fruits of the spirit. The new situation they found themselves in challenged them to use their faith to move forward in a more Godly way. Whatever it was it was an incredible transformation. Faith can do that for us.
They learned tolerance because they needed too. It is the same today. More than ever we need to find a new tolerance for different ideas or we will founder on our opposition to one another. We need to grow unto God in a way that opens us to others and does not pit us against them.
It is what happened to the Kingdom of Jerusalem. It lasted for almost a century but then found itself in an ill-conceived battle fueled by the blood lust of people not native to the kingdom but who came from Europe…they had not learned tolerance and it cost them their kingdom.
History can teach if we listen and learn.